backA recent appeal raises questions about using Artificial Intelligence in a Court ruling. The appellant contested the decision that dismissed the execution appeal in a payroll loan case, arguing the judgment was null due to the alleged use of ChatGPT in drafting it. According to the accusation, the decision would violate the principle of the natural judge and the Constitution, but the claim did not present substantial evidence to support such an assertion.
The judge responsible for the ruling concluded that the decision was well-founded and in accordance with the court’s consolidated understanding, rejecting the appeal on this matter. See the full decision here.
*
share
